Open Letter to Bitcoin Core: “Bitcoin must proceed to face up to censorship”

“Pricey Bitcoin Core, Bitcoin should stay censored.” That's the road within the sand depicted this week as Leonidas, the host of the Order Present, warning Bitcoin Core with emphasis on the fierce spam warfare.

“The intense makes an attempt by Bitcoin Core to shut coverage guidelines, censorship ordinances and rune transactions will likely be met with decisive motion.”

Bitcoin Core: Transaction Censorship is a “harmful precedent”

Leonidas argues that the Bitcoin community is designed to be impartial, unauthorized and open to anybody prepared to pay the competitors price. Censoring experiments with JPEG, memokine, or chains underneath the guise of “spam” is a nuisance of what makes Bitcoin stand out. Resistance to censorship on the fundamental stage. He warns:

“There is no such thing as a significant distinction between normalizing censorship for JPEG or MemeCoin transactions and normalizing censorship for particular monetary transactions by nation-states. Each set a really harmful precedent.”

For these following the 2025 Spam Conflict, the core vs knot debate is all over the place, with node operators beginning their voting on their toes and swarming the knots for aggressive spam anti-spam options.

Knots' Share has swelled from 69 nodes at the beginning of 2024 to over 4,200 in September 2025, and now accounts for greater than 18% of Reachable Community, a dramatic present of protests over Core's upcoming V30 launch.

If you’re in danger, right here is above the OP_Return information restrict. It's a battle for the soul of Bitcoin. Ought to the protocol stay strictly a monetary settlement layer, or can it evolve to assist modern on-chain use so long as transaction charges are being paid?

Ordinal and Rune perspective

In response to Leonidas, the ordinance and rune ecosystems drive greater than 5 billion charges, whereas supporting miners and safety, and assist “utilizing Bitcoin as cash on daily basis” exterior of the legacy story. They’re uninterested in PF, which is “gaslit” by knot supporters.

The miners aren't sitting both, he says. Many mining swimming pools that command greater than half of Bitcoin's hashrate are personally stating their willingness to simply accept consensus variant transactions so long as safety and implementation is sound. It's not neutrality simply by title. It’s how the resilience of the protocol is achieved on the bottom.

“Standing to a Diploma”: Shinobi Angle

Few feedback captured the sensation of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a

“I stand with my diploma as I'm late as I believe it's all they do. I don't participate or wait.

It’s uncooked, irritating, reflecting broader feelings amongst individuals who assume in another way than the knot. Whether or not the menace is a JPEG, Memecoin, or a monetary dispute throughout the nation, resistance to censorship of transactions is unnegotiable.

Pressure continues to boil with X and Nostr as miners, node operators and builders are locked into heated debates for nearly each technical element from Miner, Node operators and builders that make up “spam.”

The expansion of meteor node sharing in knots resulted in additional fragmentation and chain division than principle. As commented by Bitcoin Core developer Peter Tood:

“That is so unruly unmanageable that the knot crowd is changing into a severe danger for Bitcoin.”

If recruitment continues, Knott might attain 23% of the community by October, recording a turning level for consensus. The messages from Leonidas and plenty of different levels this week are clear.

“We don't sit vaguely whereas transactional censorship is normalized with Bitcoin. We defend the ideas which have at all times made Bitcoin stand out, equivalent to open entry, censorship resistance, and neutrality within the fundamental layer.”

For gatekeepers of Bitcoin Core: Bitcoin should stay censored. Practically that might betray the very factor the world's first digital foreign money was constructed to oppose.