Regardless of rising institutional adoption of Bitcoin in 2025, its environmental impression stays misunderstood and misunderstood by many, in response to ESG professional Daniel Batten.
In Saturday's X thread, Batten stated there are 9 widespread criticisms about Bitcoin mining's power use which are debunked by real-world information.
“With each early disruptive know-how comes claims based mostly on lack of awareness, lack of knowledge, and concern of the unknown,” Batten stated.
In November, Dow Jones criticized Harvard College for investing a portion of its endowment in BTC, calling it a “faux foreign money and cash laundering instrument that can be an environmental catastrophe.”
In July, Bloomberg claimed that Bitcoin was “hogging up electrical energy meant for the world's poor.”
Fable: Bitcoin is useful resource intensive and destabilizes the ability grid
He stated the idea that Bitcoin consumes giant quantities of power, water and e-waste with every transaction is solely “not true.”
Batten claims this has already been debunked by 4 peer-reviewed research that concluded that useful resource utilization is unrelated to transaction quantity. “This implies we are able to scale Bitcoin transaction quantity with out rising useful resource utilization.”
Second, the declare that Bitcoin mining destabilizes the ability grid can be a fable; actually, the other is true: it stabilizes the ability grid via versatile load administration, particularly in renewable energy-heavy energy grids like Texas.
Bitcoin mining doesn’t enhance electrical energy prices
He additionally stated there isn’t a information to assist the declare that on a regular basis shoppers are paying extra for electrical energy due to Bitcoin miners.
“There isn’t a proof within the information or in peer-reviewed analysis to assist that declare,” he added, highlighting a number of examples the place Bitcoin mining has been discovered to assist decrease costs.
Associated: Bitcoin Mining 2026 Prediction: AI Turnabout, Margin Strain, and Struggle for Survival
Fourth, in response to the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change (IPCC), evaluating Bitcoin's power use to the nation as an entire is deceptive as a result of the main focus ought to be on switching power sources, not decreasing utilization.
“The worldwide computing community used to assist Bitcoin already makes use of extra power than Thailand or Poland. Sure, actually,” Morningstar reported in November.
The assertion that “Bitcoin's carbon footprint is extraordinarily excessive'' can be incorrect. That's as a result of mining has no direct emissions, solely Scope 2 emissions from electrical energy use,” Batten stated.
“In reality, Bitcoin mining is the one world trade with sturdy third-party information displaying it exceeds the 50% sustainable power threshold.”
The emission depth of Bitcoin mining is lowering. sauce: Daniel Batten
Proof of stake isn’t essentially higher
Batten additionally disputed the concept proof-of-stake Ethereum (ETH) is extra environmentally pleasant than proof-of-work Bitcoin (BTC). Claiming that this makes PoS extra environmentally pleasant is “a mistake that confuses power use with hurt,” he stated.
In 2022, an article within the Australian Monetary Overview on Ethereum's transition to proof-of-stake acknowledged that blockchain used to make use of as a lot electrical energy as Chile.
Screenshot of a 2022 article about Ethereum merging. sauce: air power
However Batten argues that PoW has many advantages, together with mitigating methane, stabilizing the power grid, rising renewable power capability and monetizing wasted renewable power.
Batten argued that whereas the argument that landfills and flared gasoline could possibly be used for issues apart from Bitcoin mining is “technically appropriate,” it isn’t economically viable as a result of it’s only the economics of Bitcoin that make stranded methane viable.
Bitcoin mining facilitates the usage of renewable power
The declare that Bitcoin mining deprives different customers of renewable power can be false, he stated, and proof reveals the other.
“Many individuals now have entry to renewable power as a direct results of Bitcoin mining,” Batten reported, citing a challenge known as Gridless in Africa that has offered renewable power to an estimated 28,000 folks.
Lastly, in response to ESG consultants, the argument that “Bitcoin mining is losing power” is a fable, because it prevents the waste of renewable power, and research have proven that over 90% of photo voltaic and wind utilization is achieved.
“Moreover, 'losing power' isn’t an goal evaluation, however a worth judgment. It might probably solely be argued that power is being wasted if no profit is produced for humanity within the course of.”
journal: Kane Warwick loses $50,000 ETH wager on Bitmine's '1000x' share plan: Hodler's Digest
